← Search

Lee Walker

— year-end
144 matches · 106W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lee Walker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-09-11 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doris Senters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-09 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Kennoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-08 · KY/Albrecht/Foster/Walker · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Niki Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · KY/LEX/Albrecht/Walker · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-30 · KY/Albrecht/Foster/Walker · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Qingru Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-19 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · KY/LEX/SENTERS · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carmen Ignat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · KY/LEX/Albrecht/Walker · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Overstreet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-14 · KY/LEX/Shah/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Begley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · KY/LEX/Shah/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-05 · KY/LEX/Shah/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shyen Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams54 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
85.5%
59W–10L · 65% of games
3.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 51.3% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 76.4% of games
6.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 54.3% of games
3.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 65.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 23% of the time
#1 Singles
23%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#2 Singles
13%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer