← Search

Kirstin Amidon

Highlands Ranch, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 50W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kirstin Amidon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-08-24 · LEBTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janelle Banat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-10 · LEBTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-27 · LEBTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin DiCicco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · LEBTC BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-13 · SS-LGT RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · SS-LGT RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Yetzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · SS-LGT RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Mccusker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · SS-LGT RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · SS-LGT RED · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · SS-LGT RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Casson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · HRCA-N NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanette Simenson-Gurolnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · SS-LGT RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
60%
9W–6L · 55.9% of games
2.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.4% of games
3.0
40.8%
29W–42L · 46.9% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
11 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe