← Search

Janelle Banat

Highlands Ranch, CO
2.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
25 matches · 21W–4L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Janelle Banat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-08-24 · LEBTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kirstin Amidon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-17 · LEBTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-03 · LEBTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · HRCA-S TEAL · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Barbara Kelleher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · HRCA-S TEAL · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Barbara Kelleher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-14 · HRCA-S GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rj Banat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · HRCA-S TEAL · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Barbara Kelleher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · HRCA-S NAVY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Barbara Kelleher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
Madison Walz / John Richards
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Rj Banat championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · HRCA-S TEAL · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ann Barrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · HRCA-S GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rj Banat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · HRCA-S NAVY · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ann Barrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 73% of games
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
44%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams