← Search

Kay Jones

— year-end
268 matches · 138W–130L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kay Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Humphrey/LF/40&over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-31 · Bryan/LF/Day3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Hargis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Harrelson/LF/tri 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Boutin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · Harrelson/LF/tri 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Isabell Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Humphrey/LF 18s 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Hargis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-09 · Red 2: Sacra/LF 55s 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · Wasserott/LF 55s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Boutin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Stuart/LF 65s 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Stuart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · Red 2: Sacra/LF 55s 6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Benningfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · Carpenter/LF 65s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patty Steen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · Red 2: Sacra/LF 55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Hargis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · Stuart/LF 65s 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melinda Humphrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams76 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
58.1%
18W–13L · 50.9% of games
3.0
55%
44W–36L · 53.8% of games
3.5
36.4%
24W–42L · 44.9% of games
6.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 61.2% of games
7.0
50%
11W–11L · 47.5% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
55 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova