← Search

Patricia Stuart

— year-end
238 matches · 97W–141L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patricia Stuart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
L
2026-08-07 · Clark/CR/tri 4.0W day · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · Clark/CR/tri 4.0W day · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · Clark/CR/tri 4.0W day · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Janet Crockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-16 · Wilburn/LF 55s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Earls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Stuart/LF 65s 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kay Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · Blue 1: Johnson 55s 6.0/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Whitten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Humphrey/LF 18s 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Colson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · Blue 1: Johnson 55s 6.0/LF · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beverly Colson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · Wilburn/LF 55s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Wilhelm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-14 · Humphrey/LF 18s 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Hargis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · Carpenter/LF 65s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · Humphrey/LF 18s 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margot Heyne-Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams64 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.4% of games
3.0
45.5%
40W–48L · 48.9% of games
3.5
24.2%
8W–25L · 39.3% of games
6.0
80.6%
25W–6L · 59.9% of games
7.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 41.6% of games
5.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
13.3%
4W–26L · 35.6% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal