← Search

Sandra Holmes

— year-end
132 matches · 19W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandra Holmes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Ballapalooza · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kevin Hartsig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · Ballapalooza · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Chris Ward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-22 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · Smash Sisters · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michele Bowden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy DeBoer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Auston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-02 · Smash Sisters · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Summer Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · Smash Sisters · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beverly Takeuchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alyson Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Peterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-20 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy DeBoer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-18 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
26.9%
7W–19L · 39.8% of games
3.0
9.1%
5W–50L · 26.4% of games
6.0
20%
2W–8L · 34.2% of games
5.5mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 35.5% of games
6.0mixed
8%
2W–23L · 27.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe