← Search

Elizabeth Schneider

Boise, ID
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 28W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Schneider to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Balls and Racqs · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bill Agler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Balls and Racqs · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Matthew Rubio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Balls and Racqs · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brad Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · Vintage Volleys · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Churchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Vintage Volleys · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lora Bonser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · Get Smashed · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Linderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Vintage Volleys · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lora Bonser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-11 · Vintage Volleys · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lora Bonser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · Get Smashed · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristina Daccarett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-02 · Vintage Volleys · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Churchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Get Smashed · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Linderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · Get Smashed · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Linderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 54% of games
3.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 42.2% of games
6.0
20%
4W–16L · 38.8% of games
5.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal