← Search

Lee Elliott

— year-end
109 matches · 77W–32L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lee Elliott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-09-08 · CTL40/Rashley/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Sterling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · CTL40/Rashley/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Naylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · CTL40/Rashley/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Naylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · CTL40/Rashley/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donald Godish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rossi Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · CTL40/Clements/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Eckstorm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-12 · CTL (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Dye) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-02-17 · CTL40/Clements/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-02-09 · CTL40/Clements/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Tracy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-05 · CTL (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Dye) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-11-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Cornell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Eckstorm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 63.4% of games
3.5
75.8%
25W–8L · 55.3% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 72.8% of games
6.5
63.9%
23W–13L · 56.6% of games
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.7% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams