← Search

Jordan Hicks

— year-end
42 matches · 33W–9L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jordan Hicks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-27 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with John David Scheper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-10 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stuart Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hill Tippett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lydia Salais mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-1
L
2026-06-03 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lydia Salais mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · CTL18/Dye/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Georgia Altus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Ryan McCormick / Haiyan Du
2026-04-02 · CTL (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Dye) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Olsgaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-26 · CTL (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Dye) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Rienecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Christopher Phillips / Christopher Jones
2026-02-19 · CTL (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Dye) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Draffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-05 · CTL (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Dye) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John David Scheper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John David Scheper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.8% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 64% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 75.2% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 66.9% of games
3.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 70.6% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer