← Search

Danielle Keiley Fitzgerald

Rockville Centre, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 60W–66L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Danielle Keiley Fitzgerald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2024-07-12 · Point Set, Siler/Sarnelli · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-4
L
2024-07-10 · Point Set, Siler/Seifert · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Rosenthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-10 · Point Set, Siler/Sarnelli · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-08 · Point Set, Siler/Seifert · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-01 · Point Set, Siler/Seifert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Seifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-27 · Atlantic Beach, Schwartz/Deutsch · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-06-27 · Point Set, Siler/Sarnelli · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-20 · Lynbrook, Brahmbhatt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Kaufman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2024-06-18 · Atlantic Beach, Schwartz/Deutsch · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-5
L
2024-06-17 · Point Set, Siler/Seifert · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamar Einstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-14 · Lynbrook, Brahmbhatt · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Kearney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-06-13 · Point Set, Siler/Sarnelli · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
56.9%
33W–25L · 55.6% of games
3.5
36.7%
18W–31L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#2 Singles
16%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer