← Search

Ami Simons

Franklin, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 8W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ami Simons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
2026-08-20 · Thoma Richland · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christin Spender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Thoma Richland · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · Thoma Richland · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Thoma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Tramontin/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roxanne Ellwanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-16 · Tramontin/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Luteran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-07 · Thoma/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renee Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Georgette Eftekhari / Brooke Eastham
2025-10-03 · Thoma/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacia Hadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-19 · Thoma/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Virginia Seibels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-22 · Thoma/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Desiree Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-24 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Hay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-03-17 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-12-06 · Cochran/Nashville · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 56.6% of games
3.0
10%
1W–9L · 29.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#1 Singles
19%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer