← Search

Christin Spender

BRENTWOOD, TN
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 6W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Christin Spender to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-08-20 · Thoma Richland · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ami Simons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · Thoma Richland · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hays Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-09 · Thoma Richland · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Huddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Thoma/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Landman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-01 · Thoma/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-30 · Thoma/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicky Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-11-17 · Thoma/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-11 · Thoma/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-20 · Thoma/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-15 · Thoma/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-13 · Thoma/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicky Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-05 · Thoma/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Heather Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–7L · 27.7% of games
3.0
20%
4W–16L · 30% of games
5.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova