← Search

Katharine Eaton

— year-end
34 matches · 22W–12L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katharine Eaton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
W
2026-03-10 · Rogue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frances Galvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-17 · Rogue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-18 · Rogue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Pileggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-11 · Rogue · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Pileggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Michelle Smith / Tracy Griffith
2023-05-05 · Rogue · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Raybourn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2023-04-14 · Rogue · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2022-06-21 · Concord Clubbers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Pileggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-05-31 · Concord Clubbers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Pileggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-05-24 · Concord Clubbers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Pileggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2022-05-10 · Concord Clubbers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Pileggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Anna Doyle / Michele King
2022-05-03 · Concord Clubbers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Pileggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-04-26 · Concord Clubbers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Pileggi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Teams5 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 58.7% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams