← Search

Cynthia Mahaffey-Rice

Newark, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 63W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Cynthia Mahaffey-Rice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-07-27 · WCC - 55+ 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Pittenger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · WCC - 55+ 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Rudnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · WCC - 55+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Pittenger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · WCC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · WCC - 55+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · WCC - 55+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · WCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-02 · WCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura McGinley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-02-27 · WCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Giacco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-30 · WCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Sill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-5
L
2026-01-02 · WCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-09 · WCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Sill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
77.3%
34W–10L · 59% of games
3.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 49.2% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams