← Search

Jill Hartman

Fort Collins, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 69W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Hartman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
W
2026-07-23 · LT YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-17 · HMTC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · LT YELLOW · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · LT TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · LT YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · LT TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Tatman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · LT NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Mary Wilson / Tammy Bell
2026-06-15 · LT TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · HMTC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolina Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · LT TEAL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Nancy McIlvenna / Mary Wilson
2026-06-04 · LT NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Clemente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Beverly Aronson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
15W–5L · 59.2% of games
4.0
52.5%
52W–47L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
19 matches
#2 Singles
7%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert