← Search

Kim Phillips

— year-end
110 matches · 63W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Phillips to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-07-30 · LT YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Clemente
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · LT YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · LT TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peggy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · LT TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Arenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · LT NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · LT NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Arenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Mary Wilson / Tammy Bell
2026-06-15 · LT TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · LT TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peggy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-28 · LT NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Beach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-25 · LT GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Atsuko Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-22 · LT BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Buderus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · LT NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Arenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.6% of games
4.0
63.8%
37W–21L · 56.1% of games
4.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 48.6% of games
8.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.7% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
12 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert