← Search

Abigail Smith

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 105W–86L · seasons 2017–2026

Captains: add Abigail Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-08-23 · PH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Kesselman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · PH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Randy White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · PH YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Quigley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Amber Mcreynolds championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · PH YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kori White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-12 · PH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Randy White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · PH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bronk Harms mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · PH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Mcreynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · PH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Ashley Brady
2026-06-24 · PH: Abby Smith · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · PH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Aarnio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · PH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
55.8%
24W–19L · 56.4% of games
3.0
50.6%
42W–41L · 50.8% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
81%
17W–4L · 66.9% of games
6.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
45 matches
#1 Female Singles
16%
30 matches
#1 Singles
15%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
21 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova