← Search

Bronk Harms

Littleton, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 72W–26L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Bronk Harms to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
Jane Braaten / David Gill
2026-08-16 · PH BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Harms mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · PH BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Harms mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · PH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Harms mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7
W
2026-07-14 · PH NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Licko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · PH BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abigail Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · PH NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lawrence Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · PH NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Maestas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
Richard Scutellaro / Alyssa Priest
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · with Marla Schroeder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-17 · PH BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica Harms mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-10 · PH GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abigail Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · PH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abigail Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · PH GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Abigail Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
80%
8W–2L · 67.4% of games
3.0
73.7%
28W–10L · 60.6% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 74.4% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.2% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
10%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert