← Search

Ashok Selvaraj

Princeton Junction, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 43W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ashok Selvaraj to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-06-14 · CM Hackers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Prahlad Vishnubhotla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · CM Hackers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · CM Hackers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dattatray Jadhav
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · CM Hackers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paras Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Mukund Pai / Rafael Vasquez Bravo
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Murali Donthireddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashok Padmanabhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Srinivas Mandayam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-04-20 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harish Nankani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaimeen Doshi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-4, 1-0
W
2024-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gopal Thirukallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harish Nankani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 59.7% of games
4.0
62.8%
27W–16L · 55.1% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer