← Search

Harish Kumar

Bridgewater, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 139W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Harish Kumar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
L
2026-07-19 · On Point! · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raymond Matthieu Postadan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Coyle/Mira · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bobby Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Jason Smith / Todd Sherman
2026-06-28 · On Point! · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Othman Loudghiri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · On Point! · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raymond Matthieu Postadan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Andrew Hoffman / Jason Bilanin
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jon Rubinstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · On Point! · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jorge Sunderland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · with Sara Cicerone championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-10 · On Point! · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chih Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · On Point! · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Tsang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-20 · Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Cicerone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · Clan Wolf-E · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Cicerone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
19W–0L · 72% of games
4.0
79.2%
84W–22L · 66% of games
4.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.6% of games
8.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
69 matches
#1 Singles
30%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova