← Search

Giuliana Rodriguez

Tucson, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 33W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Giuliana Rodriguez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Love Means Nothing · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniyar Murataliev mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ubaldo Aguiniga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · Love Means Nothing · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Hendrickson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lien Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · Servivors · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Haycraft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erika Hard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-06 · Honey Badgers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leah Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-01 · Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Krissie Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-19 · Zero Love Given · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Fenton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-19 · Zero Love Given · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Fenton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-17 · Zero Love Given · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 48% of games
4.5
36.1%
13W–23L · 44.3% of games
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 42.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#2 Singles
16%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova