← Search

Caroline Phelps

Tucson, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 108W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caroline Phelps to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
L
Benjamin Mishra / Gracie Petrow
2026-08-02 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniyar Murataliev mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Condes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Condes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Bui mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Kalliyen Kay / Jeffery Williams
2026-06-27 · Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Bui mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-21 · Love Means Nothing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniyar Murataliev mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-06 · Not In The Forecast · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Millett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · Not In The Forecast · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · SAZ 18/4.0 W- Hannah Jablonski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Spence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · Not In The Forecast · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leah Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-28 · SAZ 18/4.0 W- Hannah Jablonski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Millett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · Not In The Forecast · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Millett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
73.5%
61W–22L · 57.6% of games
4.5
32.1%
18W–38L · 42.1% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 70.3% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 51.7% of games
8.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
48 matches
#1 Singles
15%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
22 matches
#2 Singles
10%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King