← Search

Kimberly Paolercio

— year-end
26 matches · 15W–11L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Paolercio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
Katrina Bauerlein / Maureen Doherty
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Lynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
Mary Ellen Foley
2026-06-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Regini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Jessica Reynolds
2026-05-26 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-24 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Kelsey Recht / Eleanore Kim
2026-03-19 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robyn Cameron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3
W
2026-03-11 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Tricia Cronin / Elizabeth Peck
2026-02-10 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Regini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-04 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Regini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-12 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Felisse Starker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-05 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-17 · Armonk Tennis: Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Beber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Teams5 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 69.7% of games
3.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams