← Search

Anne Parker

Chardon, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 83W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-07-15 · A40 4.0W MV1 Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · A55 8.0W MV Kanetsky · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Miki Nakamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · A40 4.0W MV1 Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Rachel Wright / Margaret VanDine
2026-06-24 · A40 4.0W MV1 Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · A55 8.0W MV Kanetsky · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rini Garber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-17 · A40 4.0W MV1 Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · A40 4.0W MV1 Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-09 · A55 8.0W MV Kanetsky · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deanne Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · A40 4.0W MV1 Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · A55 8.0W MV Kanetsky · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rini Garber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · A40 4.0W MV1 Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · A55 8.0W MV Kanetsky · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Miki Nakamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
81.7%
58W–13L · 63.1% of games
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57% of games
7.5
60%
6W–4L · 52.6% of games
8.0
60%
9W–6L · 56.4% of games
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.8% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams