← Search

Lori Digiacomo

— year-end
201 matches · 81W–120L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lori Digiacomo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Brady Bunch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dina Hopps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-26 · Steel Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Golvash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · Brady Bunch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra DeWitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · Steel Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Keck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · A40 4.0W AVB Hendricks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Kekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · A40 3.5W AVB Kerosky · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi DeNiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · A40 4.0W AVB Hendricks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camilla Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · A40 4.0W AVB Hendricks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Kekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W AVB Kerosky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi DeNiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · A40 4.0W AVB Hendricks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camilla Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · Steel Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Golvash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Brady Bunch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rajeeta Bazaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 48.1% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 53% of games
4.0
32.3%
20W–42L · 43.5% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.4% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.2% of games
7.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 47.7% of games
8.0
44.8%
13W–16L · 44.8% of games
8.5
11.8%
2W–15L · 32.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
25 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal