← Search

Samantha Spiwak

Denver, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 45W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Samantha Spiwak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-09-09 · LTC-D YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Bent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · LTC-D YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kat Holm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-10 · LTC-D TEAL · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kat Holm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-30 · LTC-D BLUE · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Bent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-25 · LTC-D BLUE · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Bent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-11 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Debra O'Donnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-30 · LTC-M GREEN · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelly Sengenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-23 · LTC-M GREEN · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Bent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-07-16 · LTC-D TEAL · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Bent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-25 · LTC-D TEAL · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meredith Greager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2025-06-18 · LTC-D TEAL · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Bent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–6L · 31.5% of games
2.5
64.9%
37W–20L · 56.9% of games
3.0
16.1%
5W–26L · 34% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe