← Search

Nancy Fairchild

Golden, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 44W–80L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Nancy Fairchild to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
W
2026-08-26 · MC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meredith Greager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · MC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meredith Greager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Redford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · MC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kay Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · MC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kay Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-15 · MC RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Noto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · MVCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Hassinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · MVCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Stephens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · MC RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jacquelyn Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · MVCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Stephens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · MC RED · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kay Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Tara Neely / Katie Newquist
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Kay Newman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
42.2%
35W–48L · 46% of games
3.0
0%
0W–7L · 31.9% of games
6.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 35.3% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
21.7%
5W–18L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova