← Search

Steve Shepley

— year-end
30 matches · 15W–15L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Steve Shepley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-05-30 · BC-MCC/JeffreyStephens4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Benner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · BC-MCC/JeffreyStephens4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Sheets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
David Hubka / Wen Hsin
2026-04-11 · BC-MCC/JeffreyStephens4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Benner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · BC-MCC/MichaelKarr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Benner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-31 · BC-MCC/MichaelKarr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajeev Rao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-01-17 · BC-MCC/MichaelKarr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Benner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-10 · BC-MCC/MichaelKarr · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-28 · BC-MCC/MichaelKarr · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Sheets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-05-10 · BC-MCC/MichaelKarr · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Rumpp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-05-11 · BC-MCC/TonyRojko · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Rojko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-06 · BC-MCC/TonyRojko · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Shure
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
Edward Ng / Barry St John
2024-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Alder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.7% of games
4.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova