← Search

Jane McClellan

Plainfield, NJ
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 10W–26L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jane McClellan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2025-06-21 · 40 Luv · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with AnnaMarie Bordonaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-31 · 40 Luv · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-22 · 40 Luv · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Earnecia Hasben-Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-08 · 40 Luv · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Gaeta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-06-01 · 40 Luv · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-05-11 · 40 Luv · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Carraby-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-05-04 · 40 Luv · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie van Zanten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Carraby-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Susan Roos / Shalonda Kelly
2023-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Carraby-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-06-25 · Plainfield 40 Luv · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Grabowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-4
L
2022-06-11 · Plainfield 40 Luv · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juanita Tam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
29%
9W–22L · 41.4% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
44%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe