← Search

Hazel-Ann Rodney

Plainfield, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 120W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hazel-Ann Rodney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history225 matches
L
Naoko Ikeda - (DQ)* / Mary Chion
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ozge Topcuoglu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · Winter Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Rogut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shana Baer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · Winter Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shana Baer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-11 · Warren (Marcus) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Himstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-4
L
2025-11-23 · Autumn Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody Rose-Bronner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-30 · Warren (Marcus) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-26 · Autumn Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-10-09 · Warren (Marcus) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherla Glasgow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-24 · NJ: Match Wise · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-07-22 · NJ: Match Wise · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
53.9%
62W–53L · 53% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
62.2%
23W–14L · 56.6% of games
8.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 34.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams