← Search

Barbara Wright

Charleston, WV
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 11W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Wright to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-05-02 · TIC Ream · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Cooke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-19 · TIC Ream · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-21 · TIC Ream · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lora Kirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Michelle Harman / Ashley Bailey
2025-05-10 · TIC Ream/Swecker · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-26 · TIC Ream/Swecker · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-17 · TIC Ream · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-28 · TIC Ream · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marjorie Swecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
B J Knoth / Danielle Johnson
2024-09-22 · TIC Ream · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Loretta Dailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-08-29 · YMCA Cooke/Swecker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Felice Joseph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-07-11 · YMCA Cooke/Swecker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Dailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-06-13 · YMCA Cooke/Swecker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-04-21 · TIC Cooke · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.9% of games
3.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 38% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert