← Search

Loretta Dailey

— year-end
55 matches · 18W–37L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Loretta Dailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
2026-05-02 · TIC Ream · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marjorie Swecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-14 · 7827 St. Clair · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annabelle Shrader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · 7827 St. Clair · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Stacey Smith
2026-04-11 · TIC Ream · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
Mary Cook / Michelle Steele
2026-03-06 · 7827 St. Clair · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Sophia Andros
2026-02-21 · TIC Ream · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · TIC Ream · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-07 · 7827 St. Clair · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-10 · TIC Ream/Swecker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Arthur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-03 · TIC Ream/Swecker · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Arthur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-04-19 · TIC Ream/Swecker · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Felice Joseph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Lauren Shah / Ashley Bailey
2025-04-06 · TIC Ream/Swecker · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.2% of games
3.0
29.7%
11W–26L · 44.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 21.8% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King