← Search

Graham High

BAHAMA, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 28W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Graham High to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-07-16 · MLong-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily McClernon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · MLong-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sterling Ingui mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · GHigh-DUR · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · GHigh-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Sybil Pye / Jack Pye
2026-06-25 · MLong-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ryan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · GHigh-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
David Wiesenhahn / Aubrey Zinaich
2026-06-04 · MLong-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Montague mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-26 · GHigh-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · GHigh-DUR · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Stanislav Kukhniy
2025-11-25 · GHigh-DUR · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Marc Rosenthal
2025-11-04 · GHigh-DUR · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Elias Peters
2025-10-28 · GHigh-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
15.6%
5W–27L · 34.1% of games
3.5
14.3%
3W–18L · 30.1% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 50.5% of games
6.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 44.9% of games
3.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#2 Singles
20%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Singles
15%
14 matches
#3 Singles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova