← Search

Sterling Ingui

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 43W–79L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sterling Ingui to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-09-11 · SSmith-HVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Muth Humphreys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · KRyan-HVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Yancy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-21 · SSmith-HVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Muth Humphreys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · KRyan-HVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ruth Caccavale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-12 · KRyan-HVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Wilhelm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · KRyan-HVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · MLong-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Maloney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · MLong-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Graham High mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · MLong-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · VMichael-HVCC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · MLong-DUR · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Chelsea Avchen
2026-06-08 · VMichael-HVCC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 48.2% of games
3.0
34%
16W–31L · 44.6% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 38.3% of games
5.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 38% of games
6.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 34.8% of games
3.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
23 matches
#2 Singles
15%
18 matches
#1 Singles
14%
17 matches
#3 Singles
12%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert