← Search

Ranya Agha

Franklin, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 113W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ranya Agha to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
W
2026-07-20 · FAC-Presser 40s 3.0 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tatyana Latinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Topf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Topf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-13 · FAC-Presser 40s 3.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reema Hasan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Malin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Malin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Dalal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
Sara Nirenberg / Peggy Offerle
2026-07-09 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marina Safroniy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marina Safroniy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Sarah Burns / Sigrid Leeman
2026-07-06 · FAC-Presser 40s 3.0 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tatyana Latinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · FAC-Stieber 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dale Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · FAC-Slazinski 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimie Rosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 64.7% of games
3.0
67.6%
50W–24L · 57.8% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.7% of games
5.5
70%
14W–6L · 61% of games
6.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.9% of games
6.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 56.1% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#1 Singles
11%
18 matches
#3 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams