← Search

Catherine Topf

Huntington Woods, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 84W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Topf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
W
2026-08-26 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rohit Khare mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-24 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Timothy Kurtz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-12 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Timothy Kurtz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joshua Maurer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Nina Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Robyn Presser championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
Melanie Muchortow / Lauren Selman
2026-07-23 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marsha Deitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-20 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ranya Agha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ranya Agha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-17 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Lacey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · BRC-Scott 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Claire Elmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 57.9% of games
3.5
42.9%
30W–40L · 45% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.6% of games
6.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.7% of games
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.7% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 31.1% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 65.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#3 Singles
6%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe