← Search

Katherine Arst

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 118W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katherine Arst to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
L
2026-08-26 · BARTON-Geer 6.5 Combo Mix · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Stelter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · BARTON-Geer 6.5 Combo Mix · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Blake Richards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · #4 Doubles · with Debra Stein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
Sara Van Wormer / Christi Charlton
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Nina Sober championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Sober
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Ewy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Sober
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-10 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Zdanowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Sober
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · BARTON-Molloy 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 50% of games
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.4% of games
3.0
89.7%
35W–4L · 63.7% of games
3.5
62.7%
32W–19L · 53.2% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.7% of games
7.0
80%
8W–2L · 61% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 61.3% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Singles
9%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova