← Search

Debra Reske

Cuyahoga Falls, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 48W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debra Reske to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-07-27 · 55 7.0W E LT Ruggles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · 55 7.0W E LT Ruggles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-08 · 55 7.0W E LT Ruggles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Balc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Laura Ferguson / Laurice Moore
2026-05-28 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clare Stacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
Alison Baranek / Carly Inkrott
2026-05-14 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Shockey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-11 · 55 7.0W E LT Ruggles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-16 · A40 3.5W LT1 Barr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 61.4% of games
3.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 52% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.7% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
24 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams