← Search

Aimee Lawlor

Medina, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 51W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Aimee Lawlor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W FA Morse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Fatica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W FA Morse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Fatica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W FA Morse · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Fatica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W FA Morse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisa Fatica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W FA Morse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Deighton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-08 · A18 3.5W TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-01 · C 6.5W TP1 Rohrig · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Cashman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-17 · A18 3.5W FA Congeni · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie V Ashworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-14 · A18 3.5W FA Congeni · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Manera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-23 · A18 3.5W FA Congeni · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Willett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-18 · A40 3.5W PM3 Whitlam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toni Congeni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-06-16 · A18 3.5W FA Congeni · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Panagopoulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
64.6%
42W–23L · 55.7% of games
3.5
24%
6W–19L · 38.5% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal