← Search

Serena Sampat

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 72W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Serena Sampat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-08-23 · WP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jarrid DeMaio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · WP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jarrid DeMaio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-06 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · WP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jarrid DeMaio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-16 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Jensik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Merman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-25 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · WP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jarrid DeMaio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Jensik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.8% of games
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.4% of games
3.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 52.2% of games
3.5
46.2%
36W–42L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.6% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 62.2% of games
7.0mixed
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#1 Singles
14%
21 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams