← Search

Heather Mitchell

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 84W–67L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Heather Mitchell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-09-03 · CACM NAVY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-22 · WP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Hallowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-4
W
2026-08-18 · CACM NAVY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Serena Sampat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · WP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Hallowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-07-30 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Claxton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamra Nathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-02 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Duganne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Duganne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
59.1%
52W–36L · 53.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.3% of games
6.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 54.4% of games
7.5mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
20 matches
#1 Singles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer