← Search

Liam Nisenfeld

— year-end
62 matches · 25W–37L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Liam Nisenfeld to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-09-12 · String Theorists · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas DeAndrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-12 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Hoffman Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Aris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · Hoffman Park · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Littell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-03 · Hoffman Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Knoblock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Parkside · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Knoblock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Hoffman Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerome Napson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · Parkside · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Hurtig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-31 · String Theory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas DeAndrea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · Hoffman Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christian Gosseaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aditya Gupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · Parkside · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Dona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
41.7%
25W–35L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova