← Search

Ben Hurtig

Philadelphia, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 85W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ben Hurtig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-07-12 · String Theory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Minh Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · Hoffman Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Knoblock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · String Theory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Sobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · Hoffman Park · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Cappelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · Parkside · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liam Nisenfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-07 · String Theory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phu Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · String Theory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Picerno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-09 · Parkside · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Knoblock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · Hoffman Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phu Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
David Miller / Ashish Patel
2026-05-02 · Parkside · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Rhood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · String Theory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Picerno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · Hoffman Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Aris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 50.6% of games
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 60% of games
4.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 52% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 55.1% of games
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 72.5% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.9%
23W–13L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer