← Search

Heidi Warriner

Louisville, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 83W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heidi Warriner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-08-25 · CVTA PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ufland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-18 · CVTA PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · CVTA PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily O'keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · CVTA PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Windy Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-1
W
2026-07-05 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damon Drew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · CVTA TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Ufland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damon Drew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-12 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Vigil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damon Drew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-05 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carmel Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · CVTA NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Lochner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-08 · BTA-IBM TEAL · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Ufland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
87.5%
42W–6L · 66.7% of games
4.0
43.3%
13W–17L · 51.9% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.8% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal