← Search

Timolyn Esson

Boulder, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 38W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Timolyn Esson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-07-14 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-07-15 · LAC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Crandall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-08 · LAC RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-01 · LAC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Crandall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-24 · LAC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jody Reenan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-05-20 · LAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-05-13 · LAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-05-06 · LAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-04-15 · LAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-07-09 · LAC RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
66.7%
32W–16L · 58.2% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#2 Singles
15%
10 matches
#1 Singles
14%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer