← Search

Amy ONeill

Wilmington, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 105W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy ONeill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Love Hurts · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danielle Chamberlain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-23 · Love Hurts · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Mary Lacy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Mary Lacy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · SETs APPEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Litchko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · Love Hurts · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · kinkySETs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dineen Driskill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · kinkySETs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dineen Driskill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-04 · SETs APPEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-30 · SETs APPEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Prysock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · kinkySETs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-03-15 · Backhanded Compliments · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Benjamin Mansi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
36W–12L · 61.2% of games
3.5
47.3%
43W–48L · 48.6% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
46 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova