← Search

Felicia Kellum

Bear, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 125W–57L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Felicia Kellum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Lois Kester championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Patricia Spellman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pattie Heidengren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · Senior Smash · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joyce Shiau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Ebony Williams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
Alison Naden / Diane Johnson
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Elizabeth Nickle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Trina Harrison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Trina Harrison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Glamour Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Love Hurts · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pattie Heidengren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Glamour Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · D'Amico · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Nickle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
72.7%
24W–9L · 61.4% of games
3.5
80.8%
59W–14L · 59.3% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.4% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.3% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer