← Search

Jennifer Kaulback

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
233 matches · 149W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Kaulback to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history233 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Kr.Levine40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with April Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-03 · TOC.Slaymaker · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Samantha Pickett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-31 · Ap.Lyon18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Emily Johnson / Carrie Russell
2026-08-26 · As.Burch40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-24 · Ap.Lyon18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Samantha Pickett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-23 · Kr.Levine40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Samantha Pickett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · As.Burch40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-26 · As.Burch18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Kaulback mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · As.Burch18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Kaulback mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-13 · As.Burch18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darshan Patel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Su.Braga18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Cristine Allison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 46.7% of games
3.0
76.7%
56W–17L · 60.1% of games
3.5
40.6%
13W–19L · 49.5% of games
5.5
60%
9W–6L · 57% of games
6.5
73.3%
22W–8L · 60.6% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.2% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams