← Search

Brian Kaulback

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 53W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brian Kaulback to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Ma.Vaughn40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeremy Broglin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Ma.Vaughn40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Geoff Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-26 · As.Burch18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kaulback mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · As.Burch18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kaulback mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
Marcus Tuttle / Chris Smith
2026-07-09 · Th.Taylor18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Th.Taylor18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · As.Burch18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kaulback mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-11 · Ri.Lowe40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Sokol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Ri.Lowe40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Sokol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Ri.Lowe40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Dooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Br.Kaulback18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-15 · Br.Kaulback18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.2% of games
3.5
32%
24W–51L · 43.5% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 49.8% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
18 matches
#3 Singles
11%
13 matches
#2 Singles
10%
12 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer