← Search

Stephanie Fry

— year-end
232 matches · 148W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Fry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history232 matches
W
2026-09-03 · LEBTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlyse Aguirre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · LEBTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marci Kucharyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · LEBTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Amspoker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · RRTC PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-23 · LEBTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Butt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · RRTC PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · LEBTC PINK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurien Hottman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · LEBTC PINK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Logsdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · LEBTC PINK · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhea McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · RRTC PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonna Mulqueen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Tanya Koch championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Erin Rhodes / Allison Guinn
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Emily McMahon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
49%
24W–25L · 48.9% of games
2.5
80%
40W–10L · 65.3% of games
3.0
68%
34W–16L · 60.7% of games
3.5
62.3%
38W–23L · 52.9% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 46.8% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#1 Female Doubles
21%
49 matches
#1 Singles
18%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
30 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer